![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Louis and mid-Missouri were vital for controlling the West, and rail lines leading across the state offered an important connection between eastern states and the communities out west. The state offered control of both the lower Mississippi valley and the Missouri River, strategic areas that could greatly factor into either side's success or failure. Both the Union and the Confederacy had a vested interest in Missouri throughout the war. Gerteis explores the state's conventional warfare and its effects on the unfolding of national history. The strategic battles fought by organized armies are often lost amidst the stories of guerrilla tactics and bloody combat, but in The Civil War in Missouri, Louis S. Though traditionally cast in a peripheral role, the conventional warfare of Missouri was integral in the Civil War's development and ultimate conclusion. ![]() Such notions, however, are far from an accurate picture of the Midwest state's contributions to the war's outcome. Combined with the state's distance from both sides' capitals, this misguided impression paints Missouri as an insignificant player in the nation's struggle to define itself. Guerrilla warfare, border fights, and unorganized skirmishes are all too often the only battles associated with Missouri during the Civil War. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |